Please
note:
Publication orders are processed manually. We will try
and complete your orders on the working day that they
are placed. |
If
you wish to pay by cheque, please make your cheques payable
to 'Centre for European Reform', and send to Kate Meakins,
Publications Manager, CER, 14 Great College Street, London,
SW1P 3RX. |
| Copyright
of these publications is held by the Centre for European
Reform. You may not copy, reproduce, republish or circulate
in any way the content from these publications except
for your own personal and non-commercial use. Any other
use requires the prior written permission of the Centre
for European Reform. |
|
|
|
| |
hard
copy
OUT
OF PRINT
April
2001 |
hard
copy
OUT
OF PRINT
March
2001 |
-------------------------
US missile
defence: Strategically sound, politically questionable
by Bruno Tertrais, April 2001
In
Europe, both governments and the broad spread of public
opinion have been largely sceptical about, or opposed
to, missile defence. Arguments between the Europeans
and the Bush administration over missile defence –
combined with tensions over the European Security
and Defence Policy, and American participation in
Balkan peacekeeping operations – may well lead
to strained transatlantic relations in the security
field in the coming years. This paper focuses on the
strategic and political consequences, in particular
for Europe, of American plans to deploy a territorial
missile defence system.
-------------------------
The
Lisbon scorecard: The status of economic reform in
Europe
by
Edward Bannerman,
March 2001
It will be left to future historians to appreciate
fully the significance of the Lisbon Summit of March
2000 in the economic evolution of Europe. But it is
already possible to argue that its impact could be
even more farreaching than that of the euro. Essentially,
how Europe creates its wealth is more important than
how Europe chooses to denominate it. At Lisbon, Europe's
leaders decided that sustained economic growth should
be a central aim of the EU.
| |
